In other words, if we put an entire cat in such a state, we would have a huge burst of radiation as all the mass-energy of the cat would escape the box just as the lid is closing. That also gives a clue about what happens with the box, or any system it describes: when an object is placed in such a quantum “box” in regards to some of its property, we are isolating that property from interacting with our reality – we aren’t looking – but in order to truly not know what the property or state is we have to remove that information from the state. The Shrödinger’s box however would not get any heavier because that would imply we feel the gravity of the cat, which means we can observe the cat from the outside, and, at least in theory, determine by the gravity waves whether its heart is still beating. Even if you throw matter into a black hole, the information/energy is not lost because you observe a corresponding increase in the mass of the black hole. So, in order to put a cat in the Shrödinger’s box, you have to find a way to destroy energy from YOUR universe, and as far as we know nothing can do that. In reality, you’re either in one, or the other, and if the other is not accessible to you in any way then for all practical purposes it does not exist for you.
True, but that implies a situation where you have a “God’s eye view” of both systems.
>”perfect isolation between two systems doesn’t violate conservation of energy, it just describes the condition where there is no exchange of energy, information, etc. Schrödinger proposed this as a thought experiment however, and for that purpose a perfectly-isolating box is not a problem. Of course I agree that this is somewhat irrelevant in an actual experiment, since it’s impossible to build a box that perfectly isolates the inside from the outside. When the cat is placed in the box and the box is closed there is no change in the total energy of the universe (or any subsystem including the box), one part of the system (the inside of the box) is simply isolated from the rest (outside the box). outside the box) it doesn’t mean that the cat “doesn’t exist”, and it certainly doesn’t mean that the cat has to be destroyed and its energy distributed to the rest of the universe. While this does mean that the state (or existence) of the cat cannot be measured from the isolated system (i.e. I disagree with most of your second paragraph: perfect isolation between two systems doesn’t violate conservation of energy, it just describes the condition where there is no exchange of energy, information, etc. Posted in Science Tagged quantum computing, quantum physics, qubit Post navigation Now we just have to hack quantum coffee maker. In particular, this could have a far-reaching impact on practical quantum computing, a topic we discussed last year.
It will be interesting to see if the physics community can reproduce this and if it causes any major changes to quantum theories. The oscillator emits at about 9 GHz and the frequency changes based on the state of the qubit. At the heart of it, though, is a simple LC oscillator. Unlike a normal observation which occurs too late, the Yale technique allows researchers to change the future state to their choice.Īs you might expect, seeing the start of a quantum jump requires quite an experimental setup and FPGAs are employed, unsurprisingly. Researchers at Yale, however, have found a way to use microwaves to indirectly monitor qubits to determine their state prior to the system making a jump. When you observe it, you force the system to one state. Schrodinger argued that until you open the box, the cat is half alive and half dead in the same way that a qubit can be in 50% of one state or another. This contradicts Schrodinger’s famous hypothetical cat that is superimposed as 50% alive and 50% dead at the same time. Yale researchers have announced that they can do what quantum physics claimed to be impossible: they can determine the state a quantum system will collapse to before it happens. If quantum physics always sounded a little squirrelly to you, take heart.
0 kommentar(er)
